The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 94 (3), 653-663
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2585837
Abstract
We report the results of a randomized field experiment involving approximately 30,000 registered voters in New Haven, Connecticut. Nonpartisan get-out-the-vote messages were conveyed through personal canvassing, direct mail, and telephone calls shortly before the November 1998 election. A variety of substantive messages were used. Voter turnout was increased substantially by personal canvassing, slightly by direct mail, and not at all by telephone calls. These findings support our hypothesis that the long-term retrenchment in voter turnout is partly attributable to the decline in face-to-face political mobilization.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Answering the Call for Prosocial BehaviorThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1998
- Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party CanvassAmerican Political Science Review, 1992
- Group Commitment and Resource Conservation: Two Field Experiments on Promoting Recycling1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990
- The Effects of Race of the Interviewer on Measures of Electoral Participation by Blacks in SRC National Election StudiesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1988
- The Efficacy of Registration DrivesThe Journal of Politics, 1985
- Stimulating Voter Turnout in a PrimaryInternational Political Science Review, 1981
- Effects of Telephone Canvassing on Turnout and Preferences: A Field ExperimentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1980
- Volunteers for Gore: The Impact of a Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee CitiesThe Journal of Politics, 1973
- How Being Interviewed Affects Voting: An ExperimentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1973
- Public Opinion and PropagandaThe American Catholic Sociological Review, 1954