Predicting Patient Outcomes, Futility, and Resource Utilization in the Intensive Care Unit: The Role of Severity Scoring Systems and General Outcome Prediction Models
- 28 February 2005
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Vol. 80 (2), 161-163
- https://doi.org/10.4065/80.2.161
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resource Utilization and Outcome in Gravely Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients With Predicted In-hospital Mortality Rates of 95% or Higher by APACHE III Scores: The Relationship With Physician and Family ExpectationsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2005
- Critical care medicine in the United States 1985–2000: An analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Assessing futility of medical interventions—Is it futile? *Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Rating the quality of intensive care units: Is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Does it fit? Is it good? Assessment of scoring systemsCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2000
- From severity scores to health gain–a difficult road but one worth travelingCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2000
- The “new” scores: what problems have been fixed, and what remain?Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2000
- Prediction of outcome from intensive careCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- The APACHE III Prognostic SystemChest, 1991
- Elective Intrahospital Admissions Versus Acute Interhospital Transfers to a Surgical Intensive Care UnitPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1991