A Three-Dimensional Scale of Intangibility
- 1 August 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Service Research
- Vol. 4 (1), 26-38
- https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050141003
Abstract
As new information technologies are being developed, so have new generations of information products. Because these new products appear highly intangible, this renews the debate about intangibility as defined in the marketing literature, which has traditionally considered it as a unidimensional or two-dimensional construct and has associated it almost exclusively with services. The objective of this study is to show that intangibility is a three-dimensional construct. A survey was conducted, and structural equation modeling analyses were used to test the proposed scale. Results showed that intangibility is indeed composed of three dimensions: mental intangibility, physical intangibility, and generality. The scale was then applied to some goods and services, and it was found that some goods appear to be less tangible than many services. These results suggest the need for some changes in how service marketing research is carried out and how managers deal with the “intangibility” of their services.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Service intangibility and its impact on consumer expectations of service qualityJournal of Services Marketing, 2000
- Marketing services: the case of a missing productJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 1998
- Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual RhetoricJournal of Consumer Research, 1994
- Risk Perception and Reduction in the Purchase of Consumer ServicesThe Service Industries Journal, 1993
- Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and EmployeesJournal of Marketing, 1992
- The impact of services versus goods on consumers’ assessment of perceived risk and variabilityJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1990
- The Intangibility of Services: Measurement and Competitive PerspectivesJournal of Services Marketing, 1990
- Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement ErrorJournal of Marketing Research, 1981
- Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- Breaking Free from Product MarketingJournal of Marketing, 1977