Short‐term low‐dose secondary prophylaxis for severe/moderate haemophilia A children is beneficial to reduce bleed and improve daily activity, but there are obstacle in its execution: a multi‐centre pilot study in China
- 11 December 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Haemophilia
- Vol. 19 (1), 27-34
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02926.x
Abstract
We recently showed in a single centre trial that low-dose secondary prophylaxis in severe/moderate haemophilia patients with arthropathy is feasible and beneficial. However, this regimen has not been validated in a multicentre setting and what obstacles are there to prophylaxis remain unclear. (i) Benefit study: to confirm the benefits of similar prophylaxis protocol in severe/moderate haemophilia A (HA) in a multicentre setting in China. (ii) Follow-up obstacle study: to investigate obstacles in compliance to prophylaxis treatment. (i) Benefit study: severe/moderate HA children with arthropathy from 15 centres were enrolled to undergo an 8-week on-demand treatment, followed by 6 to 12-week low-dose secondary prophylaxis. Outcomes compared in the two periods include joint and severe bleeding, daily activities and factor consumption. (ii) Obstacle study: questionnaires to investigators to collect data on patient and centre factors contributing to inability to comply with prophylaxis. We enrolled 191 patients from 15 centres. Sixty-six (34.6%) from three centres completed the prophylaxis protocol, and they had significantly decreased bleeding (78.8% haemarthrosis and 68.9% severe bleedings) and improved daily activities with no increase in factor consumption over that in the on-demand therapy period. The remaining 125 patients from 12 centres were not compliant to the prophylaxis protocol; questionnaire data indicated that the major obstacles were inability of patients/parents to accept (41.7%) or to adhere (33.3%) to the prophylaxis protocol, mostly because of failure to understand the benefits and to accept the frequent injections. Non-availability of a centre comprehensive care team was another important determinant. Short-term low-dose secondary prophylactic therapy is beneficial without increasing factors consumption for severe/moderate HA with arthropathy in a multi-centre setting in China. Obstacles to overcome must include improvement in comprehensive care and in education to patient/parents and healthcare personnel.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low dose secondary prophylaxis reduces joint bleeding in severe and moderate haemophilic children: a pilot study in ChinaHaemophilia, 2010
- Haemophilia care in China: achievements of a decade of World Federation of Hemophilia treatment centre twinning activitiesHaemophilia, 2008
- Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia: a new performance‐based instrument to measure disabilityHaemophilia, 2005
- Optimizing factor prophylaxis for the haemophilia population: where do we stand?Haemophilia, 2004
- Prophylactic factor replacement in hemophiliaBlood Reviews, 2004
- Secondary prophylaxis therapy: what are the benefits, limitations and unknowns?Haemophilia, 2004
- Treatment of children with haemophilia in Europe: a survey of 20 centres in 16 countriesHaemophilia, 2000
- The impact of prophylactic treatment on children with severe haemophiliaBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- Results of secondary prophylaxis in children with severe hemophiliaAmerican Journal of Hematology, 1994
- Twenty‐five years' experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and BJournal of Internal Medicine, 1992