Comparison of Paroxetine and Nortriptyline in Depressed Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease
- 28 January 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 279 (4), 287-291
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.4.287
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Comparison of Paroxetine and Nortriptyline in Depressed Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease — Context.—Depression and ischemic heart disease often are comorbid conditions and, in patients who have had a myocardial infarction, the presence of depression is associated with increased mortality. Patients with heart disease need a safe and effective treatment for depression.Objective.—To compare the efficacy, cardiovascular effects, and safety of a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, with a tricyclic antidepressant, nortriptyline hydrochloride, in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease.Design.—Two-week placebo lead-in followed by a double-blind randomized 6-week medication trial.Setting.—Research clinics in 4 university centers.Patients.—Eighty-one outpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder and with documented ischemic heart disease.Interventions.—Treatment with either paroxetine, 20 to 30 mg/d, or nortriptyline targeted to a therapeutic plasma level, 190 to 570 nmol/L (50-150 ng/mL), for 6 weeks.Main Outcome Measures.—For effectiveness of treatment, a decline in the score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by 50% and final score of 8 or less; for cardiovascular safety, heart rate and rhythm, supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures, electrocardiogram conduction intervals, indexes of heart rate variability, and rate of adverse events.Results.—By intent-to-treat analysis, 25 (61%) of 41 patients improved during treatment with paroxetine and 22 (55%) of 40 improved with nortriptyline. Neither drug significantly affected blood pressure or conduction intervals. Paroxetine had no sustained effects on heart rate or rhythm or indexes of heart rate variability, whereas patients treated with nortriptyline had a sustained 11% increase in heart rate from a mean of 75 to 83 beats per minute (P<.001) and a reduction in heart rate variability, as measured by the SD of all normal R-R intervals over a 24-hour period, from 112 to 96 (P<.01). Adverse cardiac events occurred in 1 (2%) of 41 patients treated with paroxetine and 7 (18%) of 40 patients treated with nortriptyline (P<.03).Conclusions.—Paroxetine and nortriptyline are effective treatments for depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. Nortriptyline treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of serious adverse cardiac events compared with paroxetine.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular Effects of Fluoxetine in Depressed Patients With Heart DiseaseAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1998
- Interaction of ischaemia and encainide/flecainide treatment: a proposed mechanism for the increased mortality in CAST I.Heart, 1995
- Depression and 18-Month Prognosis After Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1995
- Depression following myocardial infarction. Impact on 6-month survivalJAMA, 1993
- The safety of tricyclic antidepressants in cardiac patients. Risk-benefit reconsideredPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Cardiovascular effects of paroxetinePsychopharmacology, 1990
- Implications of the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial for antiarrhythmic drug treatmentThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Comparative effects of fluoxetine and amitriptyline on cardiac function.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1988
- The Safety of Fluoxetine - An UpdateThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
- Assessment of Cardiovascular Side Effects of Therapeutic Doses of Tricyclic Anti‐depressant DrugsAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1975