Trials on Trial
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 119 (1), 109-113
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390130091016
Abstract
• The ability of a small-scale random-control clinical trial comprising less than 500 patients to disclose clinically important differences between treatment groups depends on the event rate in the control group. The high rate of wound infection after abdominal operations has attracted many trials of methods of antibiotic prophylaxis. We reviewed all of the pertinent English literature recorded in Index Medicus in 1980 and 1981. We examined 45 articles for defects in design, analysis, and presentation. Of the 45 articles, 25 reported statistically significant differences between treatment groups and 20, no significant differences. Unsatisfactory methods of randomization were used in four trials, ethics were questionable in 22, statistical methods were incorrect in 31, and presentation was inadequate in 40. We concluded that there is room for improvement in the conduct of clinical trials. (Arch Surg 1984;119:109-113)Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Trials and Statistical Verdicts: Probable Grounds for AppealAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Pre-operation single-dose cefuroxime antimicrobial prophylaxis with and without metronidazole in elective gastrointestinal surgeryJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1980
- Single-dose cefuroxime in the prophylaxis of abdominal wound sepsisCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 1980
- Wound sepsis following gastrointestinal surgery: A comparison of topical and two-dose systemic cephradineBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Short term metronidazole therapy contrasted with povidone-iodine spray in the prevention of wound infection after appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- The use of metronidazole in the preparation of the bowel for surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979