The Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Darwin's Finches
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The American Naturalist
- Vol. 123 (4), 500-518
- https://doi.org/10.1086/284219
Abstract
Comparative methods have generally been used in attempts to understand the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Several hypotheses are outlined for the evolution of sexual dimorphism in body size in terms of the types of selection likely to be observed in contemporary studies of populations. This is used to interpret observations of selection in a population of Darwin''s medium ground finch, Geospiza fortis, in which males average about 5% larger than females. Results are supplemented with observations on feeding and breeding behavior. There is estimated to be a very high between-sex genetic correlation for homologous characters. This may account for a lack of differentiation in the degree of dimorphism demonstrated among populations and species of Geospiza. There is no evidence that resource partitioning between the sexes has played any significant part in the evolution or maintenance of the dimorphism in this population. Two contemporary selection forces are identified and implicated in the past evolution of the sexual dimorphism. These are: smaller females breed earlier than larger females, and males are under sexual selection for large size.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sexual Selection and Dimorphism in BirdsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2017
- SEXUAL SELECTION AND BODY SIZE IN MALE RED‐WINGED BLACKBIRDSEvolution, 1979
- The Evolution of Mating Systems in GrouseOrnithological Applications, 1978
- Sexual Dimorphism in Mammals: Avian Models and Unanswered QuestionsThe American Naturalist, 1977
- Comparative Ecology of Galapagos Ground Finches (Geospiza Gould): Evaluation of the Importance of Floristic Diversity and Interspecific CompetitionEcological Monographs, 1977
- Darwin's finches and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in body sizeNature, 1976
- Mammals in Which Females are Larger Than MalesThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1976
- Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971. By Bernard Campbell. x + 378 pp., figures, tables, bibliographies, index. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago. 1972. $14.75 (cloth)American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1974
- Sexual Differences in Foraging Behavior in Two Species of Dendrocopos WoodpeckersOrnithology, 1968
- Sexual Dimorphism and Food Habits in Three North American AccipitersOrnithology, 1966