Validation of Patient Reports, Automated Pharmacy Records, and Pill Counts With Electronic Monitoring of Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 37 (9), 846-857
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199909000-00002
Abstract
To evaluate the validity of patient report, pharmacy dispensing records, and pill counts as measures of antihypertensive adherence using electronic monitoring as the validation standard. The study was conducted among 286 members of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, a managed care organization, who were at least 18 years of age, on monotherapy for hypertension, and had prescription drug coverage. Prescription refill adherence during the 12 months before enrollment was determined from their automated pharmacy dispensing records. Participants were interviewed about their medication adherence before and after a 3-month electronic monitoring period during which pill counts were also performed. Adherence to both recommended number and timing of doses was estimated from electronic monitoring data. Data analysis was based on statistical correlation and analysis of variance. Electronic adherence monitoring revealed that the proportion of prescribed doses consumed was higher (0.92) than the proportion of doses taken on time (0.63). The correlation between adherence to quantity and timing of doses was 0.32. Concurrent pill counts and earlier refilling patterns were moderately correlated with electronic monitoring (pill count: r = .52 with quantity and r = .17 with timing; refill adherence r = .32 with quantity and r = .22 with timing). There was considerable misclassification of adherence reported by patients, although nonadherence was generally accurately reported. Deviation from recommended timing of doses appears to be greater than from prescribed number of doses. Pharmacy dispensing records demonstrate predictive validity as measures of cumulative exposure and gaps in medication supply. Adherence levels determined from pill counts and pharmacy dispensing records correlate more closely with quantity than with timing of doses. Nonadherence reported by patients can serve as a qualitative indicator and predictor of reduced adherence.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring adherence with therapy for chronic diseases: Implications for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- The rational clinical examination. Is this patient taking the treatment as prescribed?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment techniqueJAMA, 1989
- Precipitating factors leading to decompensation of heart failure. Traits among urban blacksArchives of Internal Medicine, 1988
- A General Method of Compliance Assessment Using Centralized Pharmacy RecordsMedical Care, 1988
- Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-reported Measure of Medication AdherenceMedical Care, 1986
- Measurement of medication compliance in a clinical setting. Comparison of three methods in patients prescribed digoxinArchives of Internal Medicine, 1979
- Diagnosing potential noncompliance. Physicians' ability in a behavioral dimension of medical careArchives of Internal Medicine, 1977
- Patients' cooperation with a medical regimen. Difficulties in identifying the noncooperatorJAMA, 1968