Nicotine replacement therapy for long-term smoking cessation: a meta-analysis
- 2 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 15 (4), 280-285
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.015487
Abstract
To assess if the effect of a single treatment episode with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) enhances smoking cessation over many years. Meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials of NRT with final follow-up more than one year after the start of treatment. Twelve eligible trials were identified, all placebo-controlled, having final follow-ups ranging from 2-8 years. All had earlier follow-ups at 12 months. They comprised 2408 active and 2384 placebo treatment participants. The odds ratio (OR) in favour of NRT at final follow-up was 1.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50 to 2.64). There was no evidence that the effect varied according to length of final follow-up (beta = 0.92, p = 0.28) or duration of initial NRT treatment (beta = 0.99, p > 0.5). The overall relapse rate between the 12 months and final follow-up was 30.0% (95% CI 23.5% to 37.5%). This rate did not differ between NRT and control groups (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.59), or length of initial NRT treatment. There was also no evidence that it varied according to length of final follow up. Due to relapse, the overall efficacy of NRT treatment in terms of additional ex-smokers declined from 10.7% over and above placebo (6.6% to 14.8%) after one year to 7.2% (3.8% to 11.3%) at an average of 4.3 years follow up. The relative efficacy of a single course of NRT remains constant over many years. The majority of relapse after 12 months occurs within the first or second year and is not detectable thereafter, suggesting that NRT has a permanent effect on smoking cessation. However, initial relapse after one year has the effect of diminishing the number of ex-smokers that can be ultimately attributed to NRT. Results after only 6-12 months of follow-up, as used in existing reviews and treatment guidelines, will overestimate the lifetime benefit and cost-efficacy of NRT by about 30%. Because the long-term benefit of NRT is modest, tobacco dependence treatment might be better viewed as a chronic disorder, requiring repeated episodes of treatment.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of a Smoking Cessation Intervention on 14.5-Year MortalityAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctorsBMJ, 2004
- Shape of the relapse curve and long‐term abstinence among untreated smokersAddiction, 2003
- Abstinence from smoking eight years after participation in randomised controlled trial of nicotine patchBMJ, 2003
- Smoking cessation with nicotine replacement therapy among health care workers: randomized double-blind study.2003
- A meta-analysis of the efficacy of over-the-counter nicotine replacementTobacco Control, 2003
- Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐AnalysisBiometrics, 2000
- Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- Effect of Nicotine Chewing Gum in Combination with Group Counseling on the Cessation of SmokingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Two and four mg nicotine chewing gum and group counselling in smoking cessation: An open, randomized, controlled trial with a 22 month follow-upAddictive Behaviors, 1988