Does the level of stapled ileoanal anastomosis influence physiologic and functional outcome?
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 37 (4), 321-329
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02053591
Abstract
The aim of this investigation was to ascertain how the length of anal canal preserved above the dentate line in stapled end-to-end ileoanal anastomosis influenced late outcome. Two groups, high cuff group and low cuff group of nine subjects with stapled anastomosis, matched for sex, age, pouch configuration, and mean follow-up, representing the highest (median, 2.5 cm) and lowest (median, 0.7 cm) anal cuff lengths in our series, were selected. Physiologic and functional parameters were appraised preoperatively, at the time of ileostomy closure, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after reestablishment of intestinal continuity. At one year, the drop in mean anal canal resting pressure was 13 percent in the high cuff group (not significant) and 31 percent in the low cuff group (P < 0.05); mean maximum squeezing pressure did not differ significantly from preoperative values in both groups. The mean volume of the ileal pouch was higher in the low cuff group at all insufflation pressures. The rectoanal inhibition reflex reappeared in four high cuff group patients and in none of the low cuff group patients. Mean distention pressure (cm H2O) and volume (ml) eliciting urge sensation were 80 and 360 in the low cuff group compared with 40 and 240 in the high cuff group (P < or = 0.05). Daytime bowel movements and night incontinence were significantly better in the low cuff group. No statistical differences were observed for night stool frequency, daytime incontinence, pad use (day and night), discrimination between gas and feces, ability to defer evacuation, and difficulty in emptying the pouch. Patients with stapled anastomoses and a low rectal cuff length, despite presenting lower anal resting pressure and absence of rectoanal inhibition reflex, had a better functional outcome in terms of continence than those with a high cuff length.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1991
- Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomyversus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Correlation between laboratory findings and clinical outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: Serial studies in 20 patients with end-to-end pouch-anal anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- The Stapled Deal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis a Randomized Study Comparing two Different Pouch DesignsScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1990
- Function after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Physiological parameters influencing function in restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Anal sensation after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: A pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis: A technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986