Valsartan, Captopril, or Both in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, or Both
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 November 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 349 (20), 1893-1906
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa032292
Abstract
Angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors such as captopril reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity among patients with myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, or both. In a double-blind trial, we compared the effect of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan, the ACE inhibitor captopril, and the combination of the two on mortality in this population of patients. Patients receiving conventional therapy were randomly assigned, 0.5 to 10 days after acute myocardial infarction, to additional therapy with valsartan (4909 patients), valsartan plus captopril (4885 patients), or captopril (4909 patients). The primary end point was death from any cause. During a median follow-up of 24.7 months, 979 patients in the valsartan group died, as did 941 patients in the valsartan-and-captopril group and 958 patients in the captopril group (hazard ratio in the valsartan group as compared with the captopril group, 1.00; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.11; P=0.98; hazard ratio in the valsartan-and-captopril group as compared with the captopril group, 0.98; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.09; P=0.73). The upper limit of the one-sided 97.5 percent confidence interval for the comparison of the valsartan group with the captopril group was within the prespecified margin for noninferiority with regard to mortality (P=0.004) and with regard to the composite end point of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (P<0.001). The valsartan-and-captopril group had the most drug-related adverse events. With monotherapy, hypotension and renal dysfunction were more common in the valsartan group, and cough, rash, and taste disturbance were more common in the captopril group. Valsartan is as effective as captopril in patients who are at high risk for cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. Combining valsartan with captopril increased the rate of adverse events without improving survival.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- What did we learn from the OPTIMAAL trial? What can we expect from VALIANT?American Heart Journal, 2003
- Non‐inferiority trials: design concepts and issues – the encounters of academic consultants in statisticsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- A Randomized Trial of the Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Valsartan in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Review: Prospects for ARB in the next five yearsJournal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, 2001
- Points to consider on switching between superiority and non‐inferiorityBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2001
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failureEuropean Heart Journal, 2001
- Statistical Methods for Comparison to Placebo in Active-Control TrialsDrug Information Journal, 2001
- A Clinical Trial of the Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitor Trandolapril in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- ACE Inhibition in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967