Size distinctions betweenBetulapollen types — A review
Open Access
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Grana
- Vol. 35 (4), 248-256
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139609430011
Abstract
It is difficult to reliably distinguish Betula species solely on pollen morphological criteria. Size differences between the pollen of different Betula species have proved to provide a basis for their separation. Pollen grain size is affected by both sedimentary environment and laboratory treatment. Only grains from similar sediment lithologies that have had identical laboratory treatment can be considered comparable in size with each other. A simple size comparison between modern and fossil pollen is not advisable. In this paper previous methods for the separation of birch pollen types are reviewed and some new measurements of the Finnish birch species are presented and discussed.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postglacial vegetation and climatic change in the upper Peace River district, AlbertaCanadian Journal of Botany, 1986
- QUANTITATIVE BIRCH (BETULA L.) POLLEN SEPARATION BY ANALYSIS OF SIZE FREQUENCY DATANew Phytologist, 1981
- Early and Late Weichselian chronology and birch assemblages in DenmarkBoreas, 1980
- On the size of CorylusavellanaL. pollen mounted in silicone oilGrana, 1978
- A Palaeoecological Study of the Late-Glacial Lake at Torreberga, Scania, South SwedenOikos, 1970
- THE IDENTIFICATION OF BETULA NANA POLLENNew Phytologist, 1968
- On Pollen Size Variations and the Occurrence ofBetula Nanain Different Layers of a BogGrana Palynologica, 1966
- Notes on the Pollen Morphology of Swedish Trees and ShrubsGrana Palynologica, 1962
- A Note on Silicone Oil as a Mounting Medium for Fossil and Modern PollenEcology, 1961
- Undersökning rörande möjligheterna att i fossilt material urskilja de olika Betula-arternas pollenGeologiska Föreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 1951