Screening opportunity bias in case-control studies of cancer screening
- 23 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Applied Statistics
- Vol. 35 (5), 537-546
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760701835755
Abstract
In case-control evaluations of cancer screening, subjects who have died from the cancer in question (cases) are compared with those who have not (controls) with respect to screening histories. This method is subject to a rather subtle bias, among others, whereby the cases have greater opportunity to have been screened than the controls. In this paper, we propose a method of correction for this bias. We demonstrate its use on two case-control studies of mammographic screening for breast cancer.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A case-control study to estimate the impact on breast cancer death of the breast screening programme in WalesJournal of Medical Screening, 2004
- Case-Control Studies of the Efficacy of Cancer ScreeningEpidemiology, 2004
- Mammographic screening: case–control studiesAnnals of Oncology, 2003
- Correcting for Non-Compliance Bias in Case–Control Studies to Evaluate Cancer Screening ProgrammesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2002
- THE SWEDISH TWO-COUNTY TRIAL TWENTY YEARS LATERRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2000
- Investigation of Design and Bias Issues in Case-Control Studies of Cancer Screening Using MicrosimulationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Case-control studies of cancer screening: theory and practice.JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- Case-Control Studies of ScreeningInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1991
- ESTIMATION OF THE DURATION OF A PRE-CLINICAL DISEASE STATE USING SCREENING DATAAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1983