Cooling a nanomechanical resonator with quantum back-action
Top Cited Papers
- 14 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 443 (7108), 193-196
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05027
Abstract
A search for galaxies at z≈7–8, roughly 700 million years from the Big Bang finds only one candidate galaxy at z≈7–8, where ten would be expected if there were no evolution in the galaxy population between z≈7 and z≈6. The simplest explanation is that the Universe is just too young to have built up many luminous galaxies at z≈7–8 by hierarchical merging of small galaxies. A search for galaxies at z≈7–8, roughly 700 million years from the Big Bang finds only one candidate galaxy at z≈7–8, where ten would be expected if there were no evolution in the galaxy population between z≈7 and z≈6. The simplest explanation is that the Universe is just too young to have built up many luminous galaxies at z≈7–8 by hierarchical merging of small galaxies. Quantum mechanics demands that the act of measurement must affect the measured object. When a linear amplifier is used to continuously monitor the position of an object, the Heisenberg uncertainty relationship requires that the object be driven by force impulses, called back-action1,2,3. Here we measure the back-action of a superconducting single-electron transistor (SSET) on a radio-frequency nanomechanical resonator. The conductance of the SSET, which is capacitively coupled to the resonator, provides a sensitive probe of the latter's position; back-action effects manifest themselves as an effective thermal bath, the properties of which depend sensitively on SSET bias conditions. Surprisingly, when the SSET is biased near a transport resonance, we observe cooling of the nanomechanical mode from 550 mK to 300 mK—an effect that is analogous to laser cooling in atomic physics. Our measurements have implications for nanomechanical readout of quantum information devices and the limits of ultrasensitive force microscopy (such as single-nuclear-spin magnetic resonance force microscopy). Furthermore, we anticipate the use of these back-action effects to prepare ultracold and quantum states of mechanical structures, which would not be accessible with existing technology.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantum nanoelectromechanics with electrons, quasi-particles and Cooper pairs: effective bath descriptions and strong feedback effectsNew Journal of Physics, 2005
- Upper limits on gravitational wave bursts in LIGO’s second science runPhysical Review D, 2005
- Quantum-limited position detection and amplification: A linear response perspectivePhysical Review B, 2004
- Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopyNature, 2004
- Approaching the Quantum Limit of a Nanomechanical ResonatorScience, 2004
- Interferometric measurements of the position of a macroscopic body: Towards observation of quantum limitsPhysical Review A, 1999
- The Radio-Frequency Single-Electron Transistor (RF-SET): A Fast and Ultrasensitive ElectrometerScience, 1998
- Quantum MeasurementPhysics Today, 1994
- Observation of combined Josephson and charging effects in small tunnel junction circuitsPhysical Review Letters, 1989
- Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiersPhysical Review D, 1982