Colonoscopy in the diagnosis of unexplained rectal bleeding
- 1 November 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 21 (8), 590-593
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02586406
Abstract
Colonoscopy, done to elucidate the cause of obscure tectal bleeding not diagnosable on the basis of previous proctoscopic and Ba-enema examinations, resulted in a 17% diagnostic yield in this series. Of 105 patients 18 had lesions: 3 had carcinomas, 6 had polyps, 8 had colitis and 1 had proctitis. When bleeding was demonstrated by the physician, there was a higher diagnostic yield (22.5%) than when bleeding was reported only by the patient (5.9%). Descriptions of the bleeding by the patients were somewhat unreliable. Of the 18 lesions revealed by the colonoscope, 16 were in the left colon. The basic work-up for undiagnosed rectal bleeding should include history, physical examination, sigmoidoscopy and Ba-enema study. When no diagnosis is found, subsequent work-up must be individualized. When bleeding was demonstrated to originate from the colon, colonoscopic examination should be performed.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Colonoscopy in Clinical PracticeSouthern Medical Journal, 1977
- Fiberoptic PansigmoidoscopyGastroenterology, 1977
- FIBEROPTIC PANSIGMOIDOSCOPY - EVALUATION AND COMPARISON WITH RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY1977
- Endoscopic ComplicationsJAMA, 1976
- The Results of Diagnostic Colonoscopy in the Management of Unexplained Bleeding from the Rectum1Anz Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Diagnostic ColonoscopyGastroenterology, 1975
- Comparison of colonoscopy and the contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal diseaseThe American Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Hospital Topics: Examination of the Whole Colon with the Fibreoptic ColonoscopeBMJ, 1972