COMPARISON OF SCREEN DETECTED AND CLINICALLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER IN THE EUROPEAN RANDOMIZED STUDY OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER, SECTION ROTTERDAM
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 174 (1), 121-125
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000162061.40533.0f
Abstract
This report provides a comparison of characteristics detected in the screening and control arms of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam. Between December 1993 and January 1999, 35,148 men 55 to 74 years old were randomized to European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam, including 17,635 in the screening arm and 17,513 in the control arm. Prostate specific antigen testing, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and sextant biopsies were offered to all participants in the screening arm according to 2 algorithms. All screening detected cancers and cancers found in the control arm were evaluated at the same cutoff point, that is January 1, 2003. To identify prostate cancer cases in the control arm yearly linkage was performed with the Rotterdam Cancer Registry database. Followup information was collected by chart review. By January 1, 2003, 1,269 cancers were detected in the screening arm and 336 were detected in the control arm. A shift to more favorable clinical stages and histological grades on biopsy was seen in the screening arm of the trial. T1C and T2 cancers were 5.8 and 6.2 times more often diagnosed, respectively, in the screening arm than in the control arm of the trial. Only 4.6% of control arm cancers were found through opportunistic screening. Although a favorable shift in prognostic factors was seen for the screening arm of the trial, these results do not provide evidence that prostate cancer screening has an effect on prostate cancer mortality.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Results of a randomized, population‐based study of biennial screening using serum prostate‐specific antigen measurement to detect prostate carcinomaCancer, 2004
- Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate CancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Prostate-specific antigen cutoff of 2.6 ng/mL for prostate cancer screening is associated with favorable pathologic tumor featuresUrology, 2002
- Prostate cancer mortality reduction by screening: Power and time frame with complete enrollment in the European randomised screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) trialInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN TESTING AND DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION BEFORE AND DURING A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER: EUROPEAN RANDOMIZED STUDY OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER, ROTTERDAMJournal of Urology, 2000
- Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam)International Journal of Cancer, 1999
- Evaluation of the Digital Rectal Examination as a Screening Test for Prostate CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- REPEAT SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER AFTER 1-YEAR FOLLOWUP IN 984 BIOPSIED MEN: CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF DETECTED CANCERJournal of Urology, 1998
- Prospective Evaluation Plan for Randomised Trials of Prostate Cancer ScreeningJournal of Medical Screening, 1996
- Prognosis in patients with carcinoma of the prostateCancer, 1970