Monitoring programs need to take into account imperfect species detectability
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Basic and Applied Ecology
- Vol. 5 (1), 65-73
- https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00194
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and applicationOikos, 2002
- DOUBLE SAMPLING TO ESTIMATE DENSITY AND POPULATION TRENDS IN BIRDSOrnithology, 2002
- Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richnessEcology Letters, 2001
- FOREST FRAGMENTATION AND BIRD COMMUNITY DYNAMICS: INFERENCE AT REGIONAL SCALESEcology, 2001
- A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND ABUNDANCE FROM POINT COUNTSThe Auk, 2000
- COMDYN: software to study the dynamics of animal communities using a capture—recapture approachBird Study, 1999
- ESTIMATING RATES OF LOCAL SPECIES EXTINCTION, COLONIZATION, AND TURNOVER IN ANIMAL COMMUNITIESEcological Applications, 1998
- ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF HETEROGENEITY IN SPECIES DETECTABILITYEcology, 1998
- Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case StudiesEcological Monographs, 1992
- Robust Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probabilities Vary Among AnimalsEcology, 1979