Validity of self-reported weight: a study of urban brazilian adults
Open Access
- 1 August 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Revista de Saúde Pública
- Vol. 27 (4), 271-276
- https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89101993000400007
Abstract
In order to evaluate the validity of self-reported weight for use in obesity prevalence surveys, self-reported weight was compared to measured weight for 659 adults living in the Porto Alegre county, RS Brazil in 1986-87, both weights being obtained by a technician in the individual's home on the same visit. The mean difference between self-reported and measured weight was small (-0.06 +/- 3.16 kg; mean +/- standard deviation), and the correlation between reported and measured weight was high (r=0.97). Sixty-two percent of participants reported their weight with an error of < 2 kg, 87% with an error of < 4 kg, and 95% with an error of < 6 kg. Underweight individuals overestimated their weight, while obese individuals underestimated theirs (p 30) by reported weight was 10%, by measured weight 11%. Thus, the validity of reported weight is acceptable for surveys of the prevalence of ponderosity in similar settings.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fatores de risco para doenças não-transmissíveis em área metropolitana na região sul do Brasil: prevalência e simultaneidadeRevista de Saúde Pública, 1993
- Classification and Evaluation of the ObesitiesMedical Clinics of North America, 1989
- Accuracy of Self-Reported Body Weight Compared to Measured Body WeightScandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1987
- RELIABILITY OF RECALL OF DRUG USAGE AND OTHER HEALTH-RELATED INFORMATION1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- COMPARISON OF SELF-REPORTED AND MEASURED HEIGHT AND WEIGHTAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- The accuracy of self-reported weightsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- Distortion in self-reported height and weight dataJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 1981
- ESTIMATING PREVALENCE FROM THE RESULTS OF A SCREENING TESTAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1978