Negative Predictive Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound in a Large Series of Patients with a Clinical Suspicion of Pancreatic Cancer
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 100 (12), 2658-2661
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00315.x
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been shown to be very accurate in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the absence of pancreatic cancer in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer is not well documented. Our aim was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS in patients with a suspicion of pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively reviewed, from our EUS database (between January 1999 and March 2003), 693 patients who were suspected of having pancreatic cancer and had EUS examinations. A total of 155 patients were found by EUS to have a completely normal pancreas. Indications for EUS in these patients included: weight loss/abdominal pain; and/or pancreatic enlargement/fullness on computed tomography (CT); and/or bile duct/pancreatic duct narrowing on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; and/or an elevated CA 19-9. Follow-up information was obtained in 135/155 (87%) patients from patient phone calls and/or physician visits and/or CT scan. The mean follow-up period was 25 months (range 8–48 months). No patients developed pancreatic cancer during the follow-up period. Following the EUS examination, no work-up was required in 119/135 (88%) of patients. CT scan was performed in 16 patients at 6 months postprocedure, none of which showed a pancreatic mass. The NPV of EUS in excluding pancreatic cancer in those patients with follow-up was 100%. EUS is highly specific in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with a NPV of 100% and obviates the need for further diagnostic testing. In patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer, EUS should be considered as the initial diagnostic modality.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The value of imaging techniques in the staging of pancreatic cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector Computed Tomography for Detecting and Staging Pancreatic CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic populationJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2004
- Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUSGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic massesAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography–Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Suspected Pancreatic CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Endosonography Is Superior to Angiography in the Preoperative Assessment of Vascular Involvement Among Patients with Pancreatic CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2001
- EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinomaGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2000
- Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging.Radiology, 1994
- Endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic diseaseGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1989