Anti‐bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Vol. 75 (3), 465-487
- https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905x26011
Abstract
The participant role approach represents a view of bullying as a group process in which bystanders often encourage the bullying or silently witness it, while little support is given to the victim (e.g. Salmivalli, Lagerspetz, Björkqvist, Osterman, & Kaukiainen, 1996). There is a discrepancy between students' attitudes (which are often against bullying) and their actual behaviour in bullying situations, and this may be an important factor contributing to the persistence of the problem.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an anti-bullying intervention programme targeting the group as a whole. Class teachers who attended a 1-year training course carried out the interventions in school classes. The present evaluation of the project is based on multi-level modelling, assessing the programme effects after 12 months of intervention, utilizing a cohort longitudinal design with adjacent cohorts (Olweus & Alsaker, 1991) also taking into account the degree of implementation of the programme.The intervention was implemented in 48 school classes (Grades 4, 5, and 6) from 16 Finnish schools, involving 1,220 children (600 girls and 620 boys).The present report is based on questionnaire data collected at two assessment points during the project, assessing the frequencies of bullies and victims, the extent of observed and experienced bullying, students' attitudes and efficacy beliefs related to bullying, and their participant role behaviours (self- and peer-reported). Reports were collected from teachers about the concrete actions taken in order to compare the actual content of the intervention to what had been planned.A positive impact of the intervention programme was found on several outcome variables (e.g. frequencies of bullies and victims, observed and experienced bullying, attitudes and efficacy beliefs, and to some extent, participant role behaviours). The intervention effects were found more often in Grade 4 than in Grade 5, and often only in schools with a high degree of implementation of the programme.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bullying in Middle School: Individual and School Characteristics of Victims and OffendersSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2002
- Modelling Impact HeterogeneityJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2002
- Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti‐bullying intervention in primary and secondary schoolsBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000
- Promoting prosocial pupil behaviour: 1‐A multilevel theoretical modelBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999
- What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied at school? Towards a developmental analysis of risks of being bulliedEducational Research, 1999
- The long‐term effectiveness of anti‐bullying work in primary schoolsEducational Research, 1998
- The Transition from Kindergarten to Ungraded Primary: Longitudinal Predictors of Popularity and Social ReputationEarly Education and Development, 1998
- A Multilevel Perspective on the Design and Analysis of Intervention StudiesEducational Research and Evaluation, 1998
- Assessing change in a cohort-longitudinal study with hierarchical dataPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- Bullying among Australian School Children: Reported Behavior and Attitudes toward VictimsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1991