Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma: The gynecologic oncology group experience
- 31 August 2010
- Vol. 71 (S2), 606-614
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.2820710218
Abstract
Background. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has completed six major randomized trials in advanced ovarian carcinoma over the 15‐year period between 1976 and 1990. This large database of 2123 patients provides a well‐studied patient population with which to examine the importance of age as a prognostic factor. Methods. The 2123 patients studied in the six GOG trials were analyzed as a group to determine important prognostic factors. Further analyses were then conducted to examine outcome by decade of life from younger than 40 years old to 70 years old and older and to evaluate the interaction of age with other significant prognostic variables. Results. Three major prognostic factors were identified as exerting an influence on patient outcome in the overall patient population: age, volume of residual disease, and performance status. With regard to the effect of age, patients older than 69 years of age exhibited significantly poorer survival than those younger, even after correction for stage, residual disease, and performance status. This was not altered by variations in drugs, doses, and schedules; but there was no evidence that older patients tolerated intensive schedules less well than younger patients. Conclusions. Two practical conclusions result from this analysis. First, there is no evidence that modification of the drugs and schedules that make up the regimens used can overcome the adverse effect of older age. Second, age does not adversely affect the dose intensity that can be achieved; hence, age in itself is not reason to withhold or attenuate intensive chemotherapy, particularly in light of the fact that older patients have a poorer prognosis.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- A randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin with or without bacillus Calmette-Guerin in patients with suboptimal stage III and IV ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group StudyGynecologic Oncology, 1990
- Second-look laparotomy in the patient with minimal residual stage III ovarian cancer (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study)Gynecologic Oncology, 1989
- Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin with or without doxorubicin in ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Therapy of stage III (optimal) epithelial carcinoma of the ovary with melphalan or melphalan plus corynebacterium parvum (a gynecologic oncology group study)Gynecologic Oncology, 1986
- A randomized trial of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin with or without cisplatin in advanced ovarian carcinoma. A gynecologic oncology group studyCancer, 1986
- A randomized comparison of melphalan versus melphalan plus hexamethylmelamine versus adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide in ovarian carcinomaCancer, 1983
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958
- Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1952