Metastatic Cancer of the Prostate Managed with Buserelin Versus Buserelin Plus Cyproterone Acetate
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 137 (5), 912-918
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44293-5
Abstract
We recruited 71 previously untreated patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma to 2 separate consecutive prospective phase 2 studies done by the same group of investigators according to the same protocols in which only the treatment regimens differed. Of the patients 58 were treated with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue buserelin alone (0.4 mg. 3 times daily intranasally) and 13 were treated with buserelin combined with cyproterone acetate, a potent antiandrogen (50 mg. 3 times daily orally). The objective of the study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of the medication used during at least 12 months by studying adequate endocrine parameters, the rate and duration of response, as well as the rate of progression and possible side effects. All endocrine parameters were studied in 1 laboratory. Modified response criteria of the National Prostatic Cancer Project were used. The endocrine studies showed an effective suppression of plasma testosterone to castration levels by buserelin after an initial increase during the first 2 weeks. Luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormones were lowered significantly and could not be re-stimulated by the intravenous application of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. There was no correlation of plasma testosterone with response and progression. However, a significant correlation existed between higher basal cortisol levels at entry, and after 3 and 6 months, and progression. Response is reported for all patients at the 12-month interval and did not seem to differ among treatment groups. The rate of progression after all patients had been treated for 1 year was 37.9 per cent in the buserelin group and 41 per cent in the buserelin plus cyproterone acetate group. Three early deaths occurred in the buserelin group. Except for impotence, only mild side effects were noted. Our study shows that treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer by means of the luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone analogue buserelin is safe and effective. The results obtained are compatible with those obtained by castration. In our study a superior of total androgen withdrawal over testicular suppression alone could not be shown.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Buserelin as primary therapy in advanced prostatic carcinomaCancer, 1985
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY OF ORCHIDECTOMY VS LONG-ACTING D-TRP-6-LHRH MICROCAPSULES IN ADVANCED PROSTATIC CARCINOMAThe Lancet, 1985
- Clinical effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in metastatic carcinoma of prostateUrology, 1985
- Long Term Effects of Administration of a Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Superagonist Analog in Men with Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1984
- THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL OF THE LHRH AGONIST, ICI 118630, IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATIC CARCINOMAThe Lancet, 1983
- TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATIC CANCER WITH LHRH ANALOGUE ICI 118630: CLINICAL RESPONSE AND HORMONAL MECHANISMSThe Lancet, 1983
- Treatment with gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue in advanced prostatic cancer.BMJ, 1983
- Langzeitsuppression der gonadalen Testosteronproduktion durch den LH-RH-Agonisten (Buserelinacetat; Hoe 766) beim fortgeschrittenen Prostatakarzinom - eine neue Therapieform?Aktuelle Urologie, 1982
- Tumor growth inhibition in patients with prostatic carcinoma treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1982
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues for Prostate Cancer: Untoward Side Effects of High-Dose Regimens Acquire a Therapeutical DimensionEuropean Urology, 1982