Case-Control Studies of the Effect of Environmental Sanitation on Diarrhoea Morbidity: Methodological Implications of Field Studies in Africa and Asia
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 17 (2), 441-447
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/17.2.441
Abstract
The problems and prospects in the use of case-control studies to assess the effects of improvements in environmental sanitation on diarrhoea morbidity are discussed on the basis of two field studies. It is concluded that an adequate design is available for assessing the effects of a single Improvement on diarrhoeal disease. The estimates of effect appear to be valid and sufficiently precise. For addressing more complex questions of interactions, sample sizes would have to be increased substantially. The experience with two field studies suggests that there is hope that a simpler protocol may be feasible, in which only limited information is collected, in which few home visits are made, and in which analytical techniques are simple. Until more field studies have been conducted definitive conclusions cannot be reached on the applicability of such a simple, rapid and inexpensive approach.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION IN OCCUPATIONAL MORTALITY STUDIES WITH USE OF CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEORY1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.BMJ, 1986
- The Design of Case-Control Studies: The Influence of Confounding and Interaction EffectsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- SAMPLE SIZES FOR ESTIMATION OF THE ODDS RATIO IN UNMATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDIES1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- Measuring the Impact of Water Supply and Sanitation Investments on Diarrhoeal Diseases: Problems of MethodologyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1983
- CONFOUNDING: ESSENCE AND DETECTION1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1981