Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 10 May 2013
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Translational Medicine
- Vol. 2 (1), 10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/2001-1326-2-10
Abstract
Our current health research enterprise is painstakingly slow and cumbersome, and its results seldom translate into practice. The slow pace of health research contributes to findings that are less relevant and potentially even obsolete. To produce more rapid, responsive, and relevant research, we propose approaches that increase relevance via greater stakeholder involvement, speed research via innovative designs, streamline review processes, and create and/or better leverage research infrastructure. Broad stakeholder input integrated throughout the research process can both increase relevance and facilitate study procedures. More flexible and rapid research designs should be considered before defaulting to the traditional two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), but even traditional RCTs can be designed for more rapid findings. Review processes for grant applications, IRB protocols, and manuscript submissions can be better streamlined to minimize delays. Research infrastructures such as rapid learning systems and other health information technologies can be leveraged to rapidly evaluate new and existing treatments, and alleviate the extensive recruitment delays common in traditional research. These and other approaches are feasible but require a culture shift among the research community to value not only methodological rigor, but also the pace and relevance of research.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The PhenX Toolkit: Get the Most From Your MeasuresAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Agile methods for open source safety‐critical softwareSoftware: Practice and Experience, 2011
- Individual (N-of-1) trials can be combined to give population comparative treatment effect estimates: methodologic considerationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Finding the Minimal Intervention Needed for Sustained Mammography AdherenceAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
- The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical researchJournal of Psychiatric Research, 2010
- Unintended effects of statins in men and women in England and Wales: population based cohort study using the QResearch databaseBMJ, 2010
- Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence?Family Practice, 2008
- Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: A conceptual introductionDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 2007
- The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) and the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007