A comparison of clinical outcomes and cost of office versus hospital hysteroscopy
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
- Vol. 4 (1), 39-45
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80107-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value of HysteroscopyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleedingBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Hysteroscopic findings after unsuccessful dilatation and curettage for abnormal uterine bleedingAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- A comparative study between panoramic hysteroscopy with directed biopsies and dilatation and curettageAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Office hysteroscopy and suction curettage: Can we eliminate the hospital diagnostic dilatation and curettage?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Diagnostic dilation and curettage: A reappraisalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Vacuum AspirationSouthern Medical Journal, 1977
- Histopathologic evaluation of uteri curetted by flexible suction cannulaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1976
- Screening techniques in endometrial cancerCancer, 1976
- Endometrial biopsy: Another lookAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1974