Clinical guidelines: ways ahead
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 4 (4), 287-293
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.tb00088.x
Abstract
Clinical guidelines are essential in promoting the implementation of evidence-based practice within the NHS. But there are two broad schools of thought about their development and implementation: the first argues that guidelines should be entirely evidence-based and tolerates a degree of complexity which may make the guideline impractical; the second argues that we need simple guidelines, and sacrifices the strength of evidence in favour of ease of application and dissemination. Both arguments have merits and flaws, which are discussed, and ways to integrate the strengths of both are considered.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrated care pathwaysBMJ, 1998
- The use of statins: a case of misleading priorities?BMJ, 1997
- Managed care: Implications of managed care for health systems, clinicians, and patientsBMJ, 1997
- National survey of UK clinical guidelines for the management of coronary heart disease, lung and breast cancer, asthma and depressionJournal of Clinical Effectiveness, 1997
- Clinical guidelines in the independent health care sectorBMJ, 1996
- North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline developmentBMJ, 1996
- Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east LondonBMJ, 1995
- Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopyBMJ, 1995
- Clinical guidelines in 1994BMJ, 1994
- Guidelines for Counseling Postmenopausal Women about Preventive Hormone TherapyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992