Once versus twice daily LMWH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism
- 21 October 2002
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 1,p. CD003074
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003074
Abstract
In the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is administered once or twice daily. A once daily treatment regimen is more convenient for the patient and may optimise home treatment. However it is not clear whether a once daily treatment regimen is as safe and effective as a twice daily treatment regimen. The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of once daily administration to a twice daily administration of LMWH. Trials were identified through the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group (last searched May 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR/CENTRAL) (last searched Issue 1, 2002), by hand-searching other relevant journals, by checking cross-references and through personal communication with experts. Randomised clinical trials in which a once daily treatment regimen with LMWH is compared to a twice daily regimen in the initial treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. Two reviewers assessed trials on criteria for inclusion and extracted the data independently. Five studies were included with a total of 1508 patients. The pooled data showed a statistically non-significant difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism between the two treatment regimens (OR 0.82; 0.49 - 1.39). A comparison of major haemorrhagic events (OR 0.77; 0.40 - 1.45) and mortality (OR 1.14; 0.62 - 2.08) also showed a statistically non-significant difference between the two treatment regimens. Once daily treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as twice daily treatment with LMWH. However, the 95% confidence interval implies that there is a possibility that the risk of recurrent VTE might be higher when patients are treated once daily. Hence the decision to treat the patient with a once daily regimen will depend on the evaluated balance between increased convenience and the potential for a lower efficacy.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subcutaneous Enoxaparin Once or Twice Daily Compared with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin, Administered Primarily at Home, with Unfractionated Heparin, Administered in Hospital, and Subcutaneous Heparin, Administered at Home for Deep-Vein ThrombosisAngiology, 1999
- Comparison of a once Daily with a twice Daily Subcutaneous Low Molecular Weight Heparin Regimen in the Treatment of Deep Vein ThrombosisThrombosis and Haemostasis, 1998
- Pharmacodynamics and Tolerance of Two Nadroparin Formulations (10,250 and 20,500 Anti Xa IU·ml-1) Delivered for 10 Days at Therapeutic DoseThrombosis and Haemostasis, 1998
- Postoperative activation of the haemostatic system--influence of prolonged thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, 1997
- Frequency of pulmonary embolism in patients who have iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and are treated with once- or twice-daily low-molecular-weight heparinJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Prolonged Antithrombin Activity of Low-Molecular-Weight HeparinsCirculation, 1995
- Fragmin once or twice daily subcutaneously in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of the legThrombosis Research, 1992
- Correlation between anti-Xa and occurrence of thrombosis and haemorrhage in post-surgical patients treated with either logiparin® (LMWH) or unfractionated heparinThrombosis Research, 1992
- Subcutaneous treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin. A dose finding study with LMWH-NovoThrombosis Research, 1989