Intraoperative Fracture of the Femur in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Diaphyseal Fitting Stem
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Vol. 86 (3), 480-485
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200403000-00004
Abstract
Background: In revision total hip arthroplasty, intraoperative split fractures and cortical perforation fractures are becoming a more common concern with the increasing use of diaphyseal fitting cementless stems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors and frequency of intraoperative fractures with the use of these stems and their effect on radiographic and functional outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study of 211 consecutive patients who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting cementless stem between December 1998 and March 2002. Sixty-four patients sustained an intraoperative fracture of the femur. One hundred and fifteen patients were followed for a minimum of two years; function was analyzed with self-administered outcome questionnaires, and radiographs were evaluated for evidence of bone ingrowth into the femoral stem. Results: Risk factors associated with an intraoperative fracture were a substantial degree of preoperative bone loss, a low femoral cortex-to-canal ratio, underreaming of the cortex, and the use of a large-diameter stem. The majority of the diaphyseal undisplaced linear fractures occurred at the distal end of an extended trochanteric osteotomy during stem insertion. Fracture due to cortical perforation occurred most often during cement removal. These intraoperative fractures had no significant effect on the functional outcome or radiographic evidence of bone ingrowth. Conclusions: There was a surprisingly high rate of intraoperative femoral fractures associated with the use of a diaphyseal fitting stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Identification of risk factors such as preoperative bone loss and a low cortex-to-canal ratio may permit planning to avoid such fractures. However, the final functional and radiographic outcomes appear to have been unaffected by the fracture when it had been managed appropriately. Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reliability of validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacementThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000
- Minimum 10-Year-Results of Extensively Porous-Coated Stems in Revision Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1999
- THE PREVENTION OF PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES IN TOTAL HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTYOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999
- THE TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR USING CORTICAL ONLAY ALLOGRAFT STRUTSOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999
- THE USE OF STRUCTURAL ALLOGRAFTS FOR TREATING PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES ABOUT THE HIP AND KNEEOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999
- EPIDEMIOLOGYOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999
- Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesisThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996
- Extended proximal femoral osteotomy: A new technique for femoral revision arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995
- Complications with revision of the femoral component of total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987