ChlVPP/EVA Hybrid Versus the Weekly VAPEC-B Regimen for Previously Untreated Hodgkin’s Disease

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that a chemotherapy regimen of relatively low toxicity and 11 weeks' duration (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, bleomycin, and prednisolone [VAPEC-B]) is at least as effective in terms of disease control as 6 months' treatment with chlorambucil, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone/etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin (ChlVPP/EVA hybrid), which is associated with a high risk of permanent sterility. Two hundred eighty-two patients with previously untreated Hodgkin's disease, clinical stages I/II (plus mediastinal bulk and/or B symptoms) and clinical stages III/IV were randomized at three United Kingdom and one Italian center to receive either six monthly cycles of ChlVPP/EVA hybrid or 11 weekly cycles of VAPEC-B. After chemotherapy and a restaging evaluation, radiotherapy was administered to sites of previous bulk or residual radiographic abnormality before patients were observed off treatment. Further accrual to the trial was halted at the planned third interim analysis in September 1996. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, freedom from progression (FFP), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) are all significantly better in the population treated with ChlVPP/EVA than VAPEC-B, where the comparative 5-year results are 82% and 62% (FFP), 78% and 58% (EFS), and 89% and 79% (OS), respectively. The superiority of ChlVPP/EVA was seen in both low-risk and intermediate/high-risk patients, although subset analysis suggested that ChlVPP/EVA and VAPEC-B produce equivalent results in the best-prognosis patients (Hasenclever score <or= 2, nonbulky disease). Apart from possibly in the best-prognosis group, where results are equivalent, ChlVPP/EVA hybrid produces significantly better FFP, EFS, and OS than VAPEC-B in patients with previously untreated Hodgkin's disease.