Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 363 (1), 11-23
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0912321
Abstract
Carotid-artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy are both options for treating carotid-artery stenosis, an important cause of stroke. We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis to undergo carotid-artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. The primary composite end point was stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from any cause during the periprocedural period or any ipsilateral stroke within 4 years after randomization. For 2502 patients over a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, there was no significant difference in the estimated 4-year rates of the primary end point between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group (7.2% and 6.8%, respectively; hazard ratio with stenting, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.51; P=0.51). There was no differential treatment effect with regard to the primary end point according to symptomatic status (P=0.84) or sex (P=0.34). The 4-year rate of stroke or death was 6.4% with stenting and 4.7% with endarterectomy (hazard ratio, 1.50; P=0.03); the rates among symptomatic patients were 8.0% and 6.4% (hazard ratio, 1.37; P=0.14), and the rates among asymptomatic patients were 4.5% and 2.7% (hazard ratio, 1.86; P=0.07), respectively. Periprocedural rates of individual components of the end points differed between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group: for death (0.7% vs. 0.3%, P=0.18), for stroke (4.1% vs. 2.3%, P=0.01), and for myocardial infarction (1.1% vs. 2.3%, P=0.03). After this period, the incidences of ipsilateral stroke with stenting and with endarterectomy were similarly low (2.0% and 2.4%, respectively; P=0.85). Among patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the risk of the composite primary outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death did not differ significantly in the group undergoing carotid-artery stenting and the group undergoing carotid endarterectomy. During the periprocedural period, there was a higher risk of stroke with stenting and a higher risk of myocardial infarction with endarterectomy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004732.)Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: Credentialing of Interventionalists and Final Results of Lead-in PhaseJournal Of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2010
- Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST)International Journal of Stroke, 2010
- Update to the AHA/ASA Recommendations for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttackStroke, 2008
- Primary Prevention of Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2006
- Ischemic Stroke SubtypesStroke, 1999
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Selection process for surgeons in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.Stroke, 1991
- Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.Stroke, 1989