Patients with a History of Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels and Negative Transrectal US–guided Quadrant or Sextant Biopsy Results: Value of MR Imaging
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 224 (3), 701-706
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2243011553
Abstract
To determine the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed with a combined endorectal body phased-array coil for patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or suspicious free-to-total PSA ratios in whom prior transrectal ultrasonographically (US) guided biopsy findings were negative for prostate cancer. Forty-four patients with PSA levels greater than 4 ng/mL or free-to-total PSA ratios lower than 15% but negative biopsy findings were examined with T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T with a combined endorectal body phased-array coil. All patients underwent digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal US. Thirty-eight patients underwent repeat biopsy after MR imaging. The accuracy of MR imaging for detection of prostate cancer was assessed prospectively. Retrospectively, MR imaging findings were correlated with individual biopsy site findings. MR imaging and biopsy results were correlated by using a cross table to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV). Retrospective analysis results were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis. A P value of less than.05 indicated significance (chi(2) test according to Pearson). At prospective analysis, MR imaging had a sensitivity of 83% and a PPV of 50% for detection of prostate cancer; these values were 33% and 67%, respectively, for DRE and 33% and 57%, respectively, for transrectal US. At retrospective site-by-site analysis, MR imaging results did not correlate significantly with individual biopsy site findings (P =.126); sensitivity was 65% and PPV was 12%. In this patient population, MR imaging has higher sensitivity for detection of prostate cancer than DRE or transrectal US.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- SEXTANT LOCALIZATION OF PROSTATE CANCER: COMPARISON OF SEXTANT BIOPSY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING WITH STEP SECTION HISTOLOGYJournal of Urology, 2000
- TRANSPERINEAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSYJournal of Urology, 2000
- MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATIC CANCERJournal of Urology, 1998
- Repeat Prostate Needle Biopsy: Who Needs it?Journal of Urology, 1995
- Contrast-Enhanced Endorectal Coil MRI in Local Staging of Prostate CarcinomaJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1995
- DNA ploidy, serum prostate specific antigen, histological grade and immunohistochemistry as predictive parameters of lymph node metastases in T1-T3/M0 prostatic adenocarcinomaBritish Journal of Urology, 1995
- MR-Tomographie des Prostatakarzinoms - Vergleich konventionelle und endorektale MRTRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 1994
- Correlation with Grade in 316 Matched ProstatectomiesThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1994
- MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic and imaging features that influence identification and diagnosis.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum as a Screening Test for Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991