INTERPRETING THE SOCIOLOGICAL CLASSICS: CAN THERE BE A “TRUE” MEANING OF MEAD?
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Symbolic Interaction
- Vol. 9 (1), 129-146
- https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1986.9.1.129
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cases in Point: A Limited Glossary of Stumblebum UsageThe Sociological Quarterly, 1984
- On Sharpening Sociologists' ProseThe Sociological Quarterly, 1984
- Freshman English For Graduate Students: A Memoir and Two TheoriesThe Sociological Quarterly, 1983
- The Sociological Import of G. H. Mead's Theory of the PastAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- A Social Behaviorist Interpretation of the Meadian "I"American Journal of Sociology, 1979
- Toward the Analysis of Vernacular Texts: The Supernatural Narrative in Oral and Popular Print SourcesJournal of the Folklore Institute, 1979
- "Situation" versus "Frame": The "Interactionist" and the "Structuralist" Analyses of Everyday LifeAmerican Sociological Review, 1977
- Toward an Appreciation of Simmel's Fragmentary StyleThe Sociological Quarterly, 1977
- The Literary Rhetoric of Science: Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver ResearchAmerican Sociological Review, 1976
- Writing and Reading as Social ActivitiesThe Sociological Quarterly, 1973