Stabilization and Cutbacks
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Theoretical Politics
- Vol. 3 (1), 37-63
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003001004
Abstract
This paper examines twelve major families of explanation of long-term government growth. Its aim is to explore the extent to which theories of government growth can also predict a diminution of government size in some circumstances. Although reversal of government growth has been little discussed, the conclusion is that nine out of the twelve families allow for reversibility, and to that extent the development of a body of literature, separate from the government growth literature, explaining government cutbacks would appear to be intellectually redundant. The nine reversible groups of government growth theory differ according to whether reversibility of growth is contingent (requiring the conditions of growth to be reversed) or automatic (requiring only a continuation of the conditions of growth), and one group may be termed `super-auto-reversible' in that it specifies conditions in which several separate theories of government growth will go into reverse.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Game-Theoretical Interpretation of Inflation and Unemployment in Western EuropeJournal of Public Policy, 1987
- Explaining the Size of the Public Sector: Responsive and Excessive Government InterpretationsThe Journal of Politics, 1987
- An Adaptive Model of Bureaucratic PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 1985
- The termination of MedibankPolitics, 1984
- Theorizing About the Growth of Government: A Research AssessmentJournal of Public Policy, 1981
- Can Government Go Bankrupt? By Richard Rose and Guy Peters. (New York: Basic Books, 1978. Pp. xv + 283. $12.50.)American Political Science Review, 1980
- Organizational Decline and Cutback ManagementPublic Administration Review, 1978
- The expanding public sector: Wagner squaredPublic Choice, 1977
- Public Expenditure and Revenue: An International ComparisonThe Manchester School, 1961
- Patterns of Public Revenue and Expenditure1The Manchester School, 1956