Planning Theory in Retrospect: The Process of Paradigm Change
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Institute of Planners
- Vol. 43 (1), 62-71
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367708977761
Abstract
The diversity and turbulence in contemporary planning thought is not new to the profession. It comes, however, at a time when the need for rationalizing and clarifying the planning function in social organizations of democratic societies appears to be critical. Planners are becoming increasingly aware of the pluralistic nature of values and of their pluralistic composition as a group of professionals. As an approach in accomplishing this clarification, it is useful to look in retrospect at the philosophies, events, and issues that have led to the present configuration of planning thought and the process of its development over time. An analogy is suggested between the planning models that have evolved in the profession during the past twenty-five years and the process of paradigm change in the physical sciences as presented by Thomas Kuhn. Phases of planning theory development are suggested and analyzed in terms of Kuhn's dialectical approach. The article concludes by arguing the need for integrating procedural and substantive elements of planning theory in ways that reflect the multiplicity of process-object linkages of current planning practice through planning for diversity.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Kuhnian Paradigm and Political Inquiry: An AppraisalAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1973
- Foundations for a Radical Concept of PlanningJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 1973
- Paradigms, Falsification, and SociologyActa Sociologica, 1973
- The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate DepartmentsAmerican Sociological Review, 1972
- Adjunctive Planning and Urban Development PolicyUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1971
- The Future of Comprehensive Urban Planning: A CritiquePublic Administration Review, 1971
- Planning in an Era of Social RevolutionPublic Administration Review, 1971
- City Planning and Political ValuesUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1971
- Mixed-Scanning: A "Third" Approach to Decision-MakingPublic Administration Review, 1967
- Disillusion and Regeneration: The Quest for a DisciplineAmerican Political Science Review, 1965