Comparison of regional fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional anthropometry and their association with markers of diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk
Open Access
- 20 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 42 (4), 850-857
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.289
Abstract
Fat distribution is a strong and independent predictor of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is usually determined using conventional anthropometry in epidemiological studies. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can measure total and regional adiposity more accurately. Nonetheless, whether DXA provides more precise estimates of cardiovascular risk in relation to total and regional adiposity is not known. We determined the strength of the associations between DXA- and conventional anthropometry determined fat distribution and T2D and CVD risk. Waist (WC) and hip circumference (HC) and DXA was used to measure total and regional adiposity in 4950 (2119 men) participants aged 29–55 years from the Oxford Biobank without pre-existing T2D or CVD. Cross-sectional associations were compared between WC and HC vs DXA-determined regional adiposity (all z-score normalized) with impaired fasting glucose, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension and insulin resistance (IR). Following adjustment for total adiposity, upper body adiposity measurements showed consistently increased risk of T2D and CVD risk markers except for abdominal subcutaneous fat in both sexes, and arm fat in men, which showed protective associations. Among upper adiposity depots, visceral fat mass showed stronger odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.69–3.64 compared with WC 1.07–1.83. Among lower adiposity depots, HC showed modest protection for IR in both sexes [men: OR 0.80 (95%CI 0.67, 0.96); women: 0.69 (0.56, 0.86)] whereas gynoid fat and in particular leg fat showed consistent and strong protective effects for all outcomes in both men and women. The differential effect of body fat distribution on CVD and T2D were more pronounced at higher levels of total adiposity. Compared with DXA, conventional anthropometry underestimates the associations of regional adiposity with T2D and CVD risk markers. After correcting for overall adiposity, greater subcutaneous fat mass in particular in the lower body is protective relative to greater android or VAT mass.This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in menNutrition & Diabetes, 2013
- Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral FatObesity, 2012
- Android Fat Depot Is More Closely Associated with Metabolic Syndrome than Abdominal Visceral Fat in Elderly PeoplePLOS ONE, 2011
- Preferential Fat Deposition in Subcutaneous Versus Visceral Depots Is Associated with Insulin SensitivityJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2011
- The Relationship of Waist Circumference and BMI to Visceral, Subcutaneous, and Total Body Fat: Sex and Race DifferencesObesity, 2011
- Impact of Abdominal Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: The Jackson Heart StudyJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2010
- In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total body composition and fat distribution in adultsEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010
- Abdominal and gynoid adipose distribution and incident myocardial infarction in women and menInternational Journal of Obesity, 2010
- Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue: A Protective Fat Depot?Diabetes Care, 2009
- Serum lipid concentration in relation to anthropometric indices of central and peripheral fat distribution in 20,021 British men and women: Results from the EPIC-Norfolk population-based cohort studyAtherosclerosis, 2006