Numeracy and Decision Making
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 17 (5), 407-413
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x
Abstract
A series of four studies explored how the ability to comprehend and transform probability numbers relates to performance on judgment and decision tasks. On the surface, the tasks in the four studies appear to be widely different; at a conceptual level, however, they all involve processing numbers and the potential to show an influence of affect. Findings were consistent with highly numerate individuals being more likely to retrieve and use appropriate numerical principles, thus making themselves less susceptible to framing effects, compared with less numerate individuals. In addition, the highly numerate tended to draw different (generally stronger or more precise) affective meaning from numbers and numerical comparisons, and their affective responses were more precise. Although generally helpful, this tendency may sometimes lead to worse decisions. The less numerate were influenced more by competing, irrelevant affective considerations. Analyses showed that the effect of numeracy was not due to general intelligence. Numerical ability appears to matter to judgments and decisions in important ways.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Numerical Statements of Risk on Trust and Comfort with Hypothetical Physician Risk CommunicationMedical Decision Making, 2004
- Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and RationalityRisk Analysis, 2004
- Decision framing: moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processingJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2004
- On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.Psychological Methods, 2002
- General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated SamplesMedical Decision Making, 2001
- Risk as feelings.Psychological Bulletin, 2001
- Women's Perceptions of Breast Cancer RiskMedical Decision Making, 1999
- All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing EffectsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of AlternativesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Distributional theories of impression formationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992