Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?
- 29 July 2004
- Vol. 329 (7460), 286-287
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7460.286
Abstract
Researchers in the United Kingdom now have to submit their study proposals to local research ethics committees using a nationally standardised form. The form overcomes the problem of inconsistencies in the paperwork required by different committees.1 2 It is incredibly long, however, and threatens to overwhelm both committees and investigators with paperwork.2–4 The administrative burden is likely to be increased by the advent of a research management and governance framework for health and social care5 and the requirement for ethical clearance for all research by students on humans, including their tissues or data.6 Current trends are not sustainable in terms of time, money, or their impact on the environment, and it seems we have lost the plot. In this article, I examine how we can streamline the process.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi‐centre studyQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Costs of seeking ethics approval before and after the introduction of multicentre research ethics committeesJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2000
- The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjectsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2000
- Ethical Review of a Multicentre Study in Scotland: A Weighty Problem2000
- Local research ethics committee approval for a national study in Scotland.1998