A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies
Top Cited Papers
- 20 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 63 (1), 64-74
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer studyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection BiasJAMA, 2007
- Breast Cancer Treatment of Older Women in Integrated Health Care SettingsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Does Ambulatory Process of Care Predict Health‐Related Quality of Life Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Disease?Health Services Research, 2006
- Evaluating Short-Term Drug Effects Using a Physician-Specific Prescribing Preference as an Instrumental VariableEpidemiology, 2006
- Indications for Propensity Scores and Review of their Use in PharmacoepidemiologyBasic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 2006
- A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2005
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983