Eighteen‐year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy
Top Cited Papers
- 14 July 2003
- Vol. 98 (4), 697-702
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11580
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 1979–1987, the National Cancer Institute conducted a randomized, prospective study of mastectomy (MT) versus breast conservation therapy (BCT) in the treatment of patients with early‐stage breast carcinoma. After a median potential follow‐up of 18.4 years, the authors present the updated results. METHODS After informed consent was obtained from each patient, 237 evaluable women with clinical AJCC Stage I and Stage II breast carcinoma were enrolled on an institutionally reviewed protocol and randomly assigned to undergo modified radical MT (116 patients) or BCT (121 patients), which was comprised of lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and radiation therapy. Negative surgical margins in the lumpectomy arm were not required. The 237 randomized patients were followed for a median potential follow‐up of 18.4 years. The primary endpoints were overall survival and disease‐free survival. RESULTS At a median follow‐up of 18.4 years, there was no detectable difference with regard to overall survival between patients treated with MT and those treated with BCT (58% vs. 54%; P = 0.67 overall). Twenty‐seven women in the BCT arm (22%) experienced an in‐breast event. After censoring in‐breast events in the BCT arm that were salvaged successfully by MT, disease‐free survival also was found to be statistically similar (67% in the MT arm vs. 63% in the BCT arm; P = 0.64 overall). There was no statistically significant difference with regard to contralateral breast carcinoma between the two treatment arms (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS After nearly 20 years of follow‐up, there was no detectable difference in overall survival or disease‐free survival in patients with early‐stage breast carcinoma who were treated with MT compared with those treated with BCT. For BCT patients, long‐term in‐breast failures continued to occur throughout the duration of follow‐up. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of contralateral breast carcinoma between the two treatment groups. Cancer 2003;98:697–702. Published 2003 by the American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11580Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Recursive Partitioning Identifies Patients at High and Low Risk for Ipsilateral Tumor Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery and RadiationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Breast-Conserving Therapy With Mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2000
- Effects of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Early Breast Cancer — An Overview of the Randomized TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Ten-Year Results of a Comparison of Conservation with Mastectomy in the Treatment of Stage I and II Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The influence of lung density corrections on treatment planning for primary breast cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1988
- Chi-Square Tests with One Degree of Freedom; Extensions of the Mantel- Haenszel ProcedureJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958