Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network
Open Access
- 16 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Vol. 18 (2), 127-133
- https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi103
Abstract
Objective. To estimate the effect of multicentre surveillance for nosocomial infections on patients’ risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Design. Prospective multi-centre cohort study, from January 1996 to December 2000. Setting. Acute care hospitals in The Netherlands. Study participants. All 50 hospitals performing surveillance for one of seven selected procedures in the Dutch surveillance network for nosocomial infections PREZIES were invited. Thirty-seven hospitals participated (74%) and provided information on 21 920 operations, after which 885 (4%) SSI occurred. Interventions. The surveillance comprised the following: Development of surveillance methodology by multidisciplinary team; use of a standardized registration protocol and software; regular training of data collectors; anonymous inter-hospital comparison of infection rates and feedback of results; appointment of one contact person per hospital, responsible for data collection; and dissemination of results to other health care professionals. Regular discussion of both successful and failing prevention strategies that had been instituted based on the surveillance results. Outcome measure. Risk of SSI. Results. The risk of infection was reduced for patients who had an operation during the fourth surveillance year (RR = 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52–0.89) and decreased further for patients operated on during the fifth surveillance year (RR = 0.43; CI = 0.24–0.76) as compared with patients who underwent surgery within one year of the start of surveillance in their hospital. No significant risk reduction was observed for patients operated on during the second and third surveillance years. Conclusion. Surveillance, supported by participation in a surveillance network, reduced the risk of SSI in surgical patients registered in the Dutch surveillance network PREZIES. Our results suggest that infection control teams need to be perseverant and that surveillance programmes should be given time before evaluation.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rate and cost of hospital-acquired infections occurring in patients admitted to selected specialties of a district general hospital in England and the national burden imposedJournal of Hospital Infection, 2001
- An Operating Surveillance System of Surgical-Site Infections in The Netherlands: Results of the PREZIES National Surveillance NetworkInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2000
- The Impact of Surgical-Site Infections in the 1990s: Attributable Mortality, Excess Length of Hospitalization, And Extra CostsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1999
- Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1999
- The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Continuous, 10-Year Wound Infection SurveillanceArchives of Surgery, 1990
- THE EFFICACY OF INFECTION SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL PROGRAMS IN PREVENTING NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN US HOSPITALSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Effectiveness of a Surgical Wound Surveillance ProgramArchives of Surgery, 1983
- The Epidemiology of Wound Infection: A 10-Year Prospective Study of 62,939 WoundsSurgical Clinics of North America, 1980