Significance of chronic bifascicular block without apparent organic heart disease.
- 1 July 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 60 (1), 33-39
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.60.1.33
Abstract
Eighty-six of 452 patients (19%) with chronic bifascicular block were found to have no clinically apparent associated organic heart disease (OHD) and were defined as having primary conduction disease (PCD). Comparison of patients with PCD and OHD revealed a significantly lower incidence of the following clinical variables in the PCD patients (p less than 0.001): exertional angina, dyspnea, congestive heart failure, cardiomegaly, functional class I (all by study design), left bundle branch block and premature ventricular contractions. Both mean AH and HV intervals were significantly shorter in patients with PCD (p less than 0.01). The incidence of HV prolongation was 21% in PCD and 41% in OHD patients (p less than 0.001). All patients were prospectively followed for 21-2998 days with a mean +/- SEM of 1209 +/- 66 days for PCD and 1172 +/- 36 days for OHD. Atrioventricular (AV) block developed in three patients from the PCD group and 26 from the OHD group (NS), with spontaneous block occurring in one (1%) PCD patient and 19 (5%) OHD patients (p less than 0.05). Annual mortality due to sudden death as well as total cardiovascular mortality (including sudden death) for the 5-year follow-up was significantly lower in patients with PCD. Patients with PCD have significantly lower incidence of electrophysiologic abnormalities and subsequent spontaneous AV block as well as cardiovascular and sudden death mortality. The diagnosis of PCD based on clinical criteria probably underestimates the presence of underlying OHD, as suggested by a small but definite risk of cardiovascular mortality.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Prospective Study of Sudden Death in “High-Risk” Bundle-Branch BlockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Prognostic significance of left anterior hemiblock with right bundle branch block in mass screeningThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978
- Significance of A-H interval in patients with chronic bundle branch block: Clinical, electrophysiologic and follow-up observationsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- H-V interval in patients with bifascicular block (right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock): Clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic correlationsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975
- Acquired bundle branch block in a healthy populationAmerican Heart Journal, 1970
- The outlook with bundle-branch block.Heart, 1969
- Anatomic basis for atrioventricular blockThe American Journal of Medicine, 1964
- Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survivalJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1958
- Prognosis in bundle branch blockAmerican Heart Journal, 1951
- Follow-up study of sixty-four patients with Λ right bundle-branch conduction defectAmerican Heart Journal, 1935