Relationship Between Lipid Levels and Clinical Outcomes in the Long-Term Intervention With Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Trial
- 12 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 105 (10), 1162-1169
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hc1002.105136
Abstract
Background — The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) trial showed that pravastatin significantly reduced mortality and coronary heart disease (CHD) events in 9014 patients with known CHD and total cholesterol 4.0 to 7.0 mmol/L at baseline. Secondary objectives included assessment of CHD event reduction according to lipid levels. Methods and Results — We investigated the relationships of baseline and on-study lipids with subsequent CHD events in separate Cox models. Treatment effect on CHD event reduction was examined by baseline lipids and after adjustment for on-study lipid levels. Baseline lipids were significant predictors of CHD events. The adjusted relative risk per mmol/L (on placebo) was 1.24 ( P =0.004) for total cholesterol, 1.28 ( P =0.002) for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 0.52 ( P =0.004) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Apolipoproteins A1 and B were strong predictors (each P =0.001). Pravastatin reduced the risk of the composite outcome of fatal CHD or nonfatal myocardial infarction by 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 32%) and the expanded end point of fatal CHD, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or coronary revascularization by 17% (95% CI, 10% to 24%). Similar relative effects were observed for different categories of baseline lipids. The proportion of treatment effect explained by on-study lipid levels was 67% (95% CI, 27% to 106%) for the composite and 97% (95% CI, 49% to 145%) for the expanded end point. The most important lipids associated with event reduction were apolipoprotein B, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the combination of total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Conclusions — Changes in lipid levels can explain all or most of the observed benefit of pravastatin. Some treatment effect may also be mediated through nonlipid changes.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term risk stratification for survivors of acute coronary syndromesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Gemfibrozil for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Men with Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein CholesterolNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Influence of baseline lipids on effectiveness of pravastatin in the CARE trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Events and Death with Pravastatin in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and a Broad Range of Initial Cholesterol LevelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?BMJ, 1994
- Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseasesStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- The Value of Lowering Cholesterol after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Ten-Year Mortality from Cardiovascular Disease in Relation to Cholesterol Level among Men with and without Preexisting Cardiovascular DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Is Relationship Between Serum Cholesterol and Risk of Premature Death From Coronary Heart Disease Continuous and Graded?JAMA, 1986
- The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial ResultsJAMA, 1984