Differences in Pharmacokinetics Between Children and Adults—II. Children's Variability in Drug Elimination Half‐Lives and in Some Parameters Needed for Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling
- 19 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 23 (1), 117-142
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00295
Abstract
In earlier work we assembled a database of classical pharmacokinetic parameters (e.g., elimination half-lives; volumes of distribution) in children and adults. These data were then analyzed to define mean differences between adults and children of various age groups. In this article, we first analyze the variability in half-life observations where individual data exist. The major findings are as follows. The age groups defined in the earlier analysis of arithmetic mean data (0-1 week premature; 0-1 week full term; 1 week to 2 months; 2-6 months; 6 months to 2 years; 2-12 years; and 12-18 years) are reasonable for depicting child/adult pharmacokinetic differences, but data for some of the earliest age groups are highly variable. The fraction of individual children's half-lives observed to exceed the adult mean half-life by more than the 3.2-fold uncertainty factor commonly attributed to interindividual pharmacokinetic variability is 27% (16/59) for the 0-1 week age group, and 19% (5/26) in the 1 week to 2 month age group, compared to 0/87 for all the other age groups combined between 2 months and 18 years. Children within specific age groups appear to differ from adults with respect to the amount of variability and the form of the distribution of half-lives across the population. The data indicate departure from simple unimodal distributions, particularly in the 1 week to 2 month age group, suggesting that key developmental steps affecting drug removal tend to occur in that period. Finally, in preparation for age-dependent physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling, nationally representative NHANES III data are analyzed for distributions of body size and fat content. The data from about age 3 to age 10 reveal important departures from simple unimodal distributional forms-in the direction suggesting a subpopulation of children that are markedly heavier than those in the major mode. For risk assessment modeling, this means that analysts will need to consider "mixed" distributions (e.g., two or more normal or log-normal modes) in which the proportions of children falling within the major versus highweight/fat modes in the mixture changes as a function of age. Biologically, the most natural interpretation of this is that these subpopulations represent children who have or have not yet received particular signals for change in growth pattern. These apparently distinct subpopulations would be expected to exhibit different disposition of xenobiotics, particularly those that are highly lipophilic and poorly metabolized.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Body mass index during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood in relation to adult overweight and adiposity: the Fels Longitudinal StudyInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Factors Associated With Early Adiposity ReboundPediatrics, 2000
- Toxicokinetics in infants and children in relation to the ADI and TDIFood Additives & Contaminants, 1998
- Uncertainties in Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Perchloroethylene: II. Comparison of Model Predictions with Data for a Variety of Different ParametersRisk Analysis, 1993
- Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulasBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1991
- The assessment of the body fat percentage by skinfold thickness measurements in childhood and young adolescenceBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1990
- Obesity in the Young Child: Whither and Whence?Acta Paediatrica, 1986
- Unbiased plotting positions — A reviewJournal of Hydrology, 1978
- The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thicknessBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1967