Modeled Variance in Two-Level Models
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 22 (3), 342-363
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003004
Abstract
The concept of explained proportion of variance or modeled proportion of variance is reviewed in the situation of the random effects hierarchical two-level model. It is argued that the proportional reduction in (estimated) variance components is not an attractive parameter to represent the joint importance of the explanatory (independent) variables for modeling the dependent variable. It is preferable instead to work with the proportional reduction in mean squared prediction error for predicting individual values (for the modeled variance at level 1) and the proportional reduction in mean squared prediction error for predicting group averages (for the modeled variance at level 2). It is shown that when predictors are added, the proportion of modeled variance defined in this way cannot go down in the population if the model is correctly specified, but can go down in a sample; the latter situation then points to the possibility of misspecification. This provides a diagnostic means for identifying misspecification.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Hierarchical Model for Studying School EffectsSociology of Education, 1986
- Statistical Modelling Issues in School Effectiveness StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1986
- Estimation in Covariance Components ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1981
- Properties of Model II--Type Analysis of Variance Tests, A: Optimum Nature of the $F$-Test for Model II in the Balanced CaseThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1959