Near Crashes as Crash Surrogate for Naturalistic Driving Studies
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Vol. 2147 (1), 66-74
- https://doi.org/10.3141/2147-09
Abstract
Naturalistic driving is an innovative method for investigating driver behavior and traffic safety. However, as the number of crashes observed in naturalistic driving studies is typically small, crash surrogates are needed. A study evaluated the use of near crashes as a surrogate measure for assessment of the safety impact of driver behaviors and other risk factors. Two metrics, the precision and bias of risk estimation, were used to assess whether near crashes could be combined with crashes. The principles and exact conditions for improved precision and unbiased estimation were proposed and applied to data from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study. The analyses indicated that a positive relationship exists between the frequencies of contributing factors for crashes and for near crashes. The study also indicated that analyses based on combined crash and near-crash data consistently underestimate the risk of contributing factors compared to use of crash data alone. At the same time, the precision of the estimation will increase. This consistent pattern allows investigators to identify true high-risk behaviors while qualitatively assessing potential bias. In summary, the study concluded that the use of near crashes as a crash surrogate provides definite benefit when naturalistic studies are not large enough to generate sufficient numbers of crashes for statistical analysis.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Probabilistic Framework for Automated Analysis of Exposure to Road CollisionsTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008
- The extreme value theory approach to safety estimationAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2006
- Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation ModelsTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003
- Traffic conflict standards for intersectionsTransportation Planning and Technology, 1999
- Conflict analysis for prediction of fatal crash locations in mixed traffic streamsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1998
- Modeling Conflicts of Heterogeneous Traffic at Urban Uncontrolled IntersectionsJournal of Transportation Engineering, 1998
- Influence of Traffic Signal Timing on Red-Light Running and Potential Vehicle Conflicts at Urban IntersectionsTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1997
- Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts techniqueAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1986
- Traffic conflicts and exposureAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1982
- Validity of the traffic conflicts techniqueAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1981