Validity as moral obligation
- 1 March 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Southern Speech Journal
- Vol. 33 (3), 215-222
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10417946809371937
Abstract
In controversy as a method of decision making the validity of the conflicting cases can be enforced neither by the “club” of logic nor by the “club” of fact; instead it depends on the conscience and good will of the disputants and hence is neither more nor less than a matter of moral obligation on their part.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Concept of ProofMonist, 1964
- The substance of rhetoric: Good reasonsQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1963