The credibility of reluctant testimony
- 1 May 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Central States Speech Journal
- Vol. 18 (2), 97-103
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10510976709362870
Abstract
Reluctant testimony is theoretically superior to testimony emanating from a biased source. Some writers suggest that it is also superior to other unbiased testimony. Two experimental studies indicated that reluctant testimony produced higher credibility ratings than biased testimony, but unbiased testimony produced higher credibility ratings than either biased or reluctant testimony.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scales for the measurement of ethosSpeech Monographs, 1966
- A summary of experimental research in ethosSpeech Monographs, 1963
- Statistical principles in experimental design.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1962