Carer and service providers’ experiences of individual funding models for children with a disability in rural and remote areas
- 3 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Health & Social Care in the Community
- Vol. 21 (4), 432-441
- https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12032
Abstract
There is a global movement for people with a disability towards person-centred practices with opportunities for self-determination and choice. Person-centred approaches may involve individual funding (IF) for the purchase of required support. A shift to a person-centred model and IF should allow people with a disability and their carers greater choice in therapy access. However, individuals who live in rural and remote areas have less choice and access to therapy services than their metropolitan counterparts. Drawing on data from a larger study into therapy service delivery in a rural and remote area of New South Wales, Australia, this study describes some benefits and barriers to using IF to access therapy services in rural areas. Ten carers and 60 service providers participated in audio-recorded focus groups and individual interviews during which IF was discussed. Transcribed data were analysed using thematic analysis and constant comparison. Greater access to and choice of therapy providers were identified as benefits of IF. Four barriers were identified: (i) lack of information and advice; (ii) limited local service options and capacity; (iii) higher costs and fewer services and (iv) complexity of self-managing packages. A range of strategies is required to address the barriers to using IF in rural and remote areas. Carers indicated a need for: accessible information; a local contact person for support and guidance; adequate financial compensation to offset additional travel expenses and coordinated eligibility and accountability systems. Service providers required: coordinated cross-sector approaches; local workforce planning to address therapist shortages; certainty around service viability and growth; clear policies and procedures around implementation of IF. This study highlights the need for further discussion and research about how to overcome the barriers to the optimal use of an IF model for those living in rural and remote areas.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia: the 'wobbly hub and double spokes' projectBMC Health Services Research, 2012
- Towards a Framework for Implementing Individual Funding Based on an Australian Case StudyJournal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 2011
- Snapshot of flexible funding outcomes in four countriesHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2010
- Experiences of disability consumer-directed care users in Australia: results from a longitudinal qualitative studyHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2009
- Personal Assistance in SwedenJournal of Aging & Social Policy, 2007
- Paid Personal Assistance ServicesJournal of Aging & Social Policy, 2007
- Managing competition in the countryside: Non-profit and for-profit perceptions of long-term care in rural OntarioSocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Fixing the system? The experience of service users of the quasi-market in disability services in AustraliaHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2005
- ‘I have got my life back’: users' experience of direct paymentsDisability & Society, 2004