A Rational Basis for Criticisms of Organizational Economics: A Reply to Barney
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 15 (3), 394-401
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308821
Abstract
Contrary to Barney (1990) in his reply to Donaldson (1990), this article points out that the strength of criticism of organizational economics lies in part in apprehensions about its deleterious effects upon management theory. The article also argues that there is continuing reason to doubt that organizational economics readily lends itself to synthesis with traditional management theory. The issues of the narrowness of the motivational model in organizational economics and its offensiveness and the bias against systems-level analysis and against management are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Debate Between Traditional Management Theory and Organizational Economics: Substantive Differences or Intergroup Conflict?Academy of Management Review, 1990
- The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management TheoryAcademy of Management Review, 1990
- Agency Theory: An Assessment and ReviewAcademy of Management Review, 1989
- AGENCY- AND INSTITUTIONAL-THEORY EXPLANATIONS: THE CASE OF RETAIL SALES COMPENSATION.The Academy of Management Journal, 1988
- STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TO REGAIN FIT AND PERFORMANCE: IN DEFENCE OF CONTINGENCY THEORYJournal of Management Studies, 1987
- Markets, Bureaucracies, and ClansAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976
- Commitment and CommunityPublished by JSTOR ,1972
- A Formal Theory of Differentiation in OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1970