The study of landform evolution in the Sydney region: a review
- 1 November 1978
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Geographer
- Vol. 14 (2), 71-93
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049187808702744
Abstract
Since the triumph of the fluvialist school, and especially since the introduction of the cyclic model of landform evolution at the turn of this century, geomorphological research in the Sydney region has been pictured as an essentially orderly progression based on the rigorous testing of hypotheses against field evidence. But with the passage of time the tenuous nature of the foundations on which the edifice was built was largely forgotten; what began as inference became regarded as fact. Hypotheses where applied, rarely tested, and theory rather than field evidence became the ultimate court of appeal. Early accounts gave widely divergent explanations of the landscape. Even at the close of the nineteenth century, Edgeworth David still thought it necessary to refute Charles Darwin's arguments for a marine origin, though Darwin's case had been severely criticized fifty years earlier by J. D. Dana. While the earlier fluvialists undoubtedly paved the way for the advent of cyclic interpretations, the introduction of W. M. Davis's evolutionary scheme greatly increased the momentum of, and gave new direction to landform research. The rapid acceptance of Davis's Geographical Cycle was due essentially to the efforts of E. C. Andrews, but Andrews, unlike his colleagues, was also grea]tly influenced by the work of G. K. Gilbert. In fact the study of erosional process, prompted by Gilbert's example, became paramount in Andrews's work, and led to the recognition of serious anomaly in the Davisian synthesis. Rather than leading to a challenge to the cyclical model, however, anomalous evidence was either ignored or countered by essentially ad hoc modification. A review of more than half a century of research shows that the prime concern was the solving of problems which were made meaningful only by the acceptance of the cyclic model. Recent research indicates that basic tenets of the traditional interpretation of the region's landforms are unfounded, and that a thorough re‐evaluation of long‐held beliefs is needed. Not only hypotheses relating to particular landforms, but also widely held assumptions about the progress of geomorphologic research in the region are now challenged.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Geomorphological significance of late quaternary deposits of the Lake George Area, N.S.W.Australian Geographer, 1977
- Late Quaternary Climates of Australia and New GuineaQuaternary Research, 1976
- Potassium‐argon ages on the Cainozoic volcanic rocks of New South WalesJournal of the Geological Society of Australia, 1974
- Laterite and silcrete in Australia: A study of the genetic relationships of laterite and silcrete and their companion materials, and their collective significance in the formation of the weathered mantle, soils, relief and drainage of the australian continentGeoderma, 1971
- XI GeomorphologyJournal of the Geological Society of Australia, 1969
- I The general features of the geological provinces of New South WalesJournal of the Geological Society of Australia, 1969
- DARWIN'S IMPACT ON GEOGRAPHYAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1966
- Morphometric Analysis and the World-Wide Occurrence of Stepped Erosion SurfacesThe Journal of Geology, 1961
- Oxygen Isotope Paleotemperature Determinations of Australian Cainozoic FossilsScience, 1959
- The tertiary rocks of the snowy mountains, Eastern AustraliaJournal of the Geological Society of Australia, 1957